Notes on I/O schedulers
19 May 2020 09:46 AM
|
|
SummaryI/O Schedulers are used to determine the order of block operations will be passed to the storage subsystem. Linux Kernel 4.xThe Linux 4.x Kernel, used by Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL 8), CentOS 8 and Amazon Linux 2, has 3 I/O schedulers that can be used with MarkLogic Server:
Linux Kernel 3.xThe Linux 3.x Kernel, used by RHEL 7 and CentOS 7, also has 3 I/O schedulers that can be used with MarkLogic Server:
Recommended IO SchedulersThree I/O schedulers are recommended for use with MarkLogic Server:
Note: Choosing a SchedulerIf your MarkLogic host has intelligent I/O controllers (hardware RAID) or only uses SSDs/NVMEs, choose none or noop. If you're unsure, choose deadline or mq-deadline. The deadline SchedulerThe deadline scheduler attempts to minimize I/O latency by enforcing start service times for each incoming request. As I/O requests come in, they are assigned an expiry time (the deadline for that request). At the point where the expiry time for that request is reached, the scheduler forces the service of that request at the location on the disk. While it is doing this, any other requests within easy reach (without requiring too much movement) are attempted. Where possible, the scheduler attempts completion of any I/O request before the expiry time is met. The deadline scheduler can be used in situations where the host is not concerned with "fairness" for all processes residing on the system. The concern is rather where the system requires I/O requests are not stalled for long periods. The deadline scheduler can be considered the best choice given a host where one process dominates disk I/O. Most database servers are a natural fit for this category. The mq-deadline SchedulerThe mq-deadline scheduler is the adaptation of the deadline scheduler to support multi-threading. The noop SchedulerThe noop scheduler performs no scheduling optimizations, but does support request merging. All incoming I/O requests are pushed onto a FIFO queue and left to the block device to manage. Intelligent disk controllers will manage the priority from there. In any situation where a hardware controller (an HBA or similar controller attached to a SAN) can manage scheduling - or where disk seek times are not important (such as on SSDs) - any extra work performed by the scheduler at Linux kernel level is wasted. The noop scheduler can be considered the best choice when MarkLogic server is hosted on VMWare. The Kyber SchedulerThe Kyber scheduler uses a token based system for managing requests. A queueing token is requirted to allocate a request and a dispatch token is used to limit operations of a certain priority. The Kyber scheduler also defines a target latency, and tunes itself to reach the target. Kyber is a recent scheduler inspired by active queue management techniques used for network routing. The implementation is based on "tokens" that serve as a mechanism for limiting requests. A queuing token is required to allocate a request, this is used to prevent starvation of requests. A dispatch token is also needed and limits the operations of a certain priority on a given device. Finally, a target read latency is defined and the scheduler tunes itself to reach this latency goal. The implementation of the algorithm is relatively simple and it is deemed efficient for fast devices. Finding the Active SchedulerThe active scheduler is identified in the file
References[1] Unable to change IO scheduler on nvme device | |
|