HTML5 or Apps? Or, does it matter?
Posted by Diane Burley on 25 January 2013 10:03 AM |
|
A recent Business Insider report tries to make a horsey race out of HTML5 vs Native Apps on mobile devices. And really, it is a silly argument. All of its “evidence,” which points to HTML5 as the “winner,” is based on the fact that HTML5 is more FREEly accessible and that there are no cumbersome monetization or distribution issues (read: Apple) to contend with. There are branding, business, technical resources and performance issues that will keep Native Apps in business for a long, long time. In fact, truth to tell, the native apps are the labs for what becomes an HTML5 standard. As new features appear on apps, standards bodies look to incorporate them in HTML5 (although it remains to be seen if having having two standards bodies will create two versions — but that’s for another post). As Ben Forta, director of developer relations at Adobe, which makes tools for developers to write HTML5-based content told the Financial Times, “HTML5 has been seen as the answer to all of mankind’s woes and that was never the intent.” The real issue in the delivery of content wars, is whether or not content is accessible to be found, assembled and packaged. And that is a data and database issue — not a delivery one.
| |